The new UK Drug Strategy 2017…whats all the fuss about

The fight for cannabis reform in the UK reaches new lows and activities.

Last week the British government published the UK Drug Strategy 2017.   Those following the UK cannabis industry will have likely been up in arms and emotionally embroiled in the political farce that concluded in an embarrassing farce during yesterdays parliamentary session.

The full report is available here

During the debate on the new gov’t strategy, Labour MP Paul Flynn demanded direct action to allow the drug for medicinal use, telling his story on how he helped someone use it on parliament grounds.  To rapturous applause from the gallery and big headlines in today’s press, Flynn told how he made a cup of cannabis tea on the House of Commons terrace – a bar overlooking the Thames flanked by royal guards and police.

“The UK drug strategy actually made no mention of medical cannabis, so this may account for the increased levels of advocacy from those who have met constituents who find relief from their symptoms by using cannabis,” said Jason Reed of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP).

Arguments have raged in gov’t and among the liberal activists & lobbyists since the legislation was released last week.  Demanding the policy ignores the needs of ‘patients’, and tramples on the human right for patients to legally choose their own medicine.

This was not a debate about medical cannabis, this was a debate on the gov’t strategy for removing the scourge of criminality, social deviance and personal health surrounding the availability of illegal and dangerous drugs.   Whilst fair to argue that cannabis is not a dangerous drug, this was not the forum to raise the specter of the potential therapeutic cannabis offers consumers.

Cannabis legalization lobbyists have countered that buried deep in the legislation lies the ‘cloak n tails’ of the governments sinister approach to cannabis. In a statement from The Rt Hon Amber Rudd MP, current Home Secretary for struggling PM Teresa May, the government strategy is based on 4 principals.

  1. Preventing people – particularly young people – from becoming drug users in the first place
  2. Targeting those criminals seeking to profit from others’ misery and restricting the availability of drugs
  3. Offering people with a drug dependence problem the best chance of recovery through support at every stage of their life
  4. Leading and driving action on a global scale.

One of the tactics to be deployed is the exploitation of the cannabis community.:

“Evaluate police training on this issue and consider tackling cannabis as a tactic to target serious and organised crime”

Cannabis remains the drug most likely to be used by 16 to 59 year olds with 6.5% of reporting having used this drug in the past year, however, the use of cannabis is lower than a decade ago.  Many might disagree with the validity of the gov’t sponsored research, in Israel reported cannabis use has risen dramatically in recent years though understood to be less about actual use and more about the normalization and public openness to its use.

It’s time to bring clarity to the debate, it’s time to delineate to efficiently tackle access to the plant.

  • Recreational: Cannabis is not dangerous, let people choose for themselves whilst ending criminal revenue streams.
  • Medical: Cannabis can be considered ‘medicine’ only upon completion of necessary research, gathering of data and appropriate marketing authorizations (FDA / EMEA)
  • Herbal: Cannabis compounds without psychotropic effects should be treated as a food supplement.

RELATED ARTICLES

CBD and Vaping
How to start taking CBD oil
Dosing of CBD Oil

SUBMIT A COMMENT

One response to “The new UK Drug Strategy 2017…whats all the fuss about”

  1. BilboBaggins says:

    I am unsurprised that only cannabis is likely for divorce not class B and C drugs also… I actually gave up smoking and only stick to that. The tobacco in particularly is unpleasant and I need an evening to nighttime to wind myself up to smoke it. Surely this is not an answer it discriminates against non or ex smokers . That’s my current stand but the world is gripped in by the governmental fear.
    We stand in the presence of what’s deemed to be the best solution. When you have written magazines reporting on the NSA saying that “we’ll listen to you through the washing machine”; in response to civil liberty, social sciences and what are we able to do….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *